tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post6047360220497317094..comments2024-03-11T13:16:19.098-04:00Comments on Ad Orientem: Canada: RIP freedom of press, speech and religionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-89530396120274457332012-06-21T12:07:26.147-04:002012-06-21T12:07:26.147-04:00Canada, while a beautiful country, has been avidly...Canada, while a beautiful country, has been avidly attacking personal rights at least since they allowed similar trumped up charges to proceed against Ernst Zundel.Jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18288849522994640993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-15938999002462218312012-06-21T11:55:53.332-04:002012-06-21T11:55:53.332-04:00Homosexuals are necessarily peculiar, as any socie...Homosexuals are necessarily peculiar, as any society which adopted their mores into mainstream life would be extinct in a generation. (Just as feminist, gay-mad Britain and Sweden will eventually be Muslim and patriarchal). I think even you recognize this, thus your emotional appeal to a vague gnostic ideal of "being human."<br /><br />Homosexual acts are an affront to Church, Family and Tribe. A society of homosexuals would generate no marriages, no Churchings, no baptisms and no birthings to continue God's work of Creation.<br /><br />This is not to say homosexuals should not be treated with love and tolerance; we are all sinners, after all. But neither Church, Family nor Tribe can ever recognize a "right" to sodomy any more than they can recognize a "right" to promiscuity without sowing their own destruction.<br /><br />Thus, homosexuals turn to the State for validation of their lifestyle, and the secular State, with its hatred of the pre-State institutions, is more than glad to oblige.The Anti-Gnostichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04386593803225823789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-3797514728968158112012-06-21T09:32:17.014-04:002012-06-21T09:32:17.014-04:00Yes. Homosexuals are a peculiar type of individual...Yes. Homosexuals are a peculiar type of individual having no ties of love or affection to any one or any institutions. <br /><br /><br />If anyone believes the above, they have not the slightest clue about being human.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-10932910434759656572012-06-21T09:06:31.937-04:002012-06-21T09:06:31.937-04:00Homosexuals are the State's perfect citizens, ...Homosexuals are the State's perfect citizens, as they come without the baggage of competing loyalties to Family, Tribe and Church. Logically therefore, the State places them atop its hierarchy of protected classes.The Anti-Gnostichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04386593803225823789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-68992377374232185792012-06-20T21:04:27.408-04:002012-06-20T21:04:27.408-04:00Obviously, the problem comes with defining 'of...Obviously, the problem comes with defining 'offensive,' 'injurious,' and other categories of language. I know people who can be offended by even the wrong glance, let alone an otherwise harmless comment. What will happen is that countless millions of dollars that could better serve feeding the hungry or providing health care to the poor will be spend on lawyers and investigators, who will all be paid handsomely for their dutiful service to the cause of making sure we all speak nicely to one another. And, of course, the poor who are more likely to make 'homophobic' comments due to their lower education opportunities will more often than not find themselves targets of such investigations, up until new standards are developed to protect the economically-disadvantaged from being overly prosecuted... and on and on it will go. :(Fr. Georgehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01377360010219230919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-23982535242207654642012-06-20T20:42:16.831-04:002012-06-20T20:42:16.831-04:00Pleeeaase... spare us from the ubiquitous one line...Pleeeaase... spare us from the ubiquitous one line cliches. If you have something constructive to post by all means do so. I don't censor contrary opinions. But I have no patience for vapid one liners.John (Ad Orientem)https://www.blogger.com/profile/14329907942477160166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-25824690476300509502012-06-20T20:37:53.880-04:002012-06-20T20:37:53.880-04:00Yes....the freedom to hate and express it clearly,...Yes....the freedom to hate and express it clearly, are definitely a religious right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25740524.post-15648266988569676552012-06-20T17:56:40.265-04:002012-06-20T17:56:40.265-04:00I think there is a chapter in Orwell's 1984 ab...I think there is a chapter in Orwell's 1984 about this...The Archer of the Foresthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03075768526819990250noreply@blogger.com