YOu do realize that this guy is not only an atheist but militaristically anti-Christian. Which is fine, you can believe whatever you want, but when he's in the same camp as someone like Richard Dawkins who buttress their claims with the same intellectual paperweight of a Dan Brown novel while shouting it at the top of their lungs, I wonder how much I can truly sympathize with anything else he might say, right on the money though it is. The enemy of my enemy may well be my friend for now, but once that enemy is defeated, without a common enemy how much of a friend will he prove to be?
YOu do realize that this guy is not only an atheist but militaristically anti-Christian. Which is fine, you can believe whatever you want, but when he's in the same camp as someone like Richard Dawkins who buttress their claims with the same intellectual paperweight of a Dan Brown novel while shouting it at the top of their lungs, I wonder how much I can truly sympathize with anything else he might say, right on the money though it is. The enemy of my enemy may well be my friend for now, but once that enemy is defeated, without a common enemy how much of a friend will he prove to be?
ReplyDeleteFair point, and yes I do realize he is anti-religious. That said he is right on almost everything else.
ReplyDeleteChris,
ReplyDeleteThat's the genetic fallacy.
INgemar,
ReplyDeleteThat's the reality.