Due to an ongoing health crisis in the family, blogging will be 'on and off' as time and circumstances permit for the foreseeable future. I also beg your indulgence if I am slow in responding to emails. New posts will appear below this notice.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Britain Prepares to Honour 60 Years of Royal Service

...Newspapers on both the political right and left are running gushing tributes. British cities great and small are being festooned with Union Jacks for more than 10,000 street parties (about double the number held for last year’s royal wedding). Merchandisers are minting everything from diamond jubilee retro lingerie to vintage champagne. Andrew Lloyd Webber penned a song. Two national holidays have been declared.

It is all in honor of a woman who at birth was a long shot for the throne. The daughter of George VI, who became king only after the abdication of his brother to marry a divorced American socialite, the queen was coronated on June 2, 1953. The powers of the monarchy long ago reined in, she would watch from the gilded sidelines as the sun well and truly set on the greatest empire of its day, with the 1997 return of Hong Kong completing the passage of Britain’s glory days.

Yet, through it all, and with her husband and consort, Prince Philip, by her side, she would nevertheless stand as a regal symbol of state from the first icicles of the Cold War to the first moon landing, from the birth of the Beatles to the death of Amy Winehouse, from the once constant threat of Irish republican terrorism to the bombing of the London subway by homegrown Islamic extremists.

“We look across the pond and we see America tearing itself apart over politics and over here, we’re thinking, there’s a lot to be said for a constitutional monarchy,” royal biographer Robert Lacey said. “We are recognizing the queen more and more as the independent national figure that unites all of us, and the one constant in our lives for the past 60 years.”
Read the rest here.

3 comments:

Rubricarius said...

The writer of that article should be shot for referring to 'the queen'. It is always The Queen.

Long may she reign!

John (Ad Orientem) said...

Good point to which I will add the word "coronated" [sic]. But this is an American newspaper. I am just glad they spelled her name right.

Stephen said...

All well and good, but comparisons to America are hardly apt. Even if we Americans were truly in deep political throes, I would prefer that to the unabashed paying for votes via wealth distribution which the Brits have perfected, coincident with their self-inflicted death of indigenous Christian cultures. All that remains of that is perhaps the monarchy, so full two cheers is Liz and Gang can keep that remnant going.