Due to an ongoing health crisis in the family, blogging will be 'on and off' as time and circumstances permit for the foreseeable future. I also beg your indulgence if I am slow in responding to emails. New posts will appear below this notice.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

US Set To Upgrade Its Nuclear Arsenal At Huge Expense

The U.S. nuclear arsenal, the most powerful but indiscriminate class of weapons ever created, is set to undergo the costliest overhaul in its history, even as the military faces spending cuts to its conventional arms programs at a time of fiscal crisis.

For two decades, U.S. administrations have confronted the decrepit, neglected state of the aging nuclear weapons complex. Yet officials have repeatedly put off sinking huge sums into projects that receive little public recognition, driving up the costs even further.

Now, as the nation struggles to emerge from the worst recession of the postwar era and Congress faces an end-of-year deadline to avoid $1.2 trillion in automatic cuts to the federal budget over 10 years, the Obama administration is overseeing the gargantuan task of modernizing the nuclear arsenal to keep it safe and reliable.

There is no official price tag for the effort to upgrade and maintain the 5,113 warheads in the inventory, to replace old delivery systems and to renovate the aging facilities where nuclear work is performed. A study this summer by the nonpartisan Stimson Center, a Washington think tank, estimated costs would be at least $352 billion over the coming decade to operate and modernize the current arsenal. Others say the figure could be far higher, particularly if the work is delayed even longer.
Read the rest here.

There is no rational reason for keeping that many bombs around. Several studies have been conducted which show that we could get by with less than 1500 nukes. Even a quarter of that number would be enough to effectively wipe out a country the size of Russia. As much as I would like to get rid of the damned things entirely that's not reasonably possible. But we don't need 5000+.

Nuclear weapons are the most useless thing this, or any country has ever spent so much money on. They can't be used... ever. And any sane human being knows this. The only argument in their favor is that they may have prevented another world war because of the  terrifying shadow they cast.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm not so sure some Middle Eastern actors believe they can never be used.

The Anti-Gnostic said...

As the modern nation-states are now the biggest destabilizing force on the globe, the arsenals should be dismantled before they fall into the hands of, for instance, certain Middle Eastern actors. This is what the Afrikaaner government did in South Africa before handing over power to the democratic majority. It was one of the most far-sighted acts in human history.