Being a Disciple of Christ
11 hours ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
St. John of San Francisco
Orthodox Information & Resources
Orthodox Blogs
-
-
-
Me and My Bible4 days ago
-
-
-
Stories5 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
So, what is the Eucharist, really?3 months ago
Non-Orthodox Blogs
-
-
-
-
Chapter 3: Latin8 hours ago
-
-
Daily Rome Shot 11809 hours ago
-
Foot dragging. . .11 hours ago
-
-
-
Politics Economics Culture & Miscellaneous Blogs
Don't blame me... I voted for George (the Third)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Lynchburg Depot: 19433 days ago
-
-
-
-
Facial Recognition and Your Privacy4 weeks ago
Miscellaneous Sites of Interest
The Blog Yard
Where the best blogs go when they die...
Gone But Not Forgotten
-
My good people5 months ago
-
-
A Brief Return1 year ago
-
‘The Jews are beloved of God’4 years ago
-
-
Moving day6 years ago
-
Sayonara for now6 years ago
-
MY FELLOW AMERICANS7 years ago
-
A Week in Iceland! Part 18 years ago
-
Coda8 years ago
Atom / RSS
4 comments:
Isn't it insane that you even have to make that statement? It should be self-evident -- but for the relentless, ideologically driven propaganda of celebrity and pop culture in the past decade. Tolerance ... of course. Normalization ... no. Do we love every person, regardless of their passions and sin? Yes, of course. But we do not baptize sin and so nullify the possibility of repentance and transformation through the Holy Spirit. Each of us must repent of our corruption and brokenness.
For many, gay marriage is a matter of equal rights, and people view as bigotted and hateful, not to mention narrow-minded, anyone who is unwilling to grant equal rights to all 'couples'.
So no, in the current climate, which would normalize jsut about everything, it is not insane that we have to keep repeating, homosexuality is an emotional disorder, and a serious one at that, and no, we do not bless emotional disorders.
John, I would have commented at Perry's blog, but Wordpress wanted me to sign up for something just to post a comment.
This whole gay marriage thingy stems from unfair treatment of unmarried adults under America's legal apparatus governing estates and insurance. When someone dies, who gets what? When someone gets sick, whose policy pays for whom? Marital partners and bloodlines have automatic standing. Contractual relationships, such as cohabiting or gay relationships, aren't automatically recognized, and, in some cases, can't be recognized.
This lack of legal status is responsible for gays' demanding marriage or civil unions or some equivalent status that's recognized in law. Coverage under a partner's health insurance policy is especially important.
If we abstract from this legal sideshow, the moral question boils down to this: Is an Orthodox ruler morally permitted to recognize contractual freedom even if the resulting contracts regulate behavior contrary to Church teaching, such as homosexuality or polygamy?
"Where orthodoxy is optional, orthodoxy will sooner or later be proscribed." John Richard Neuhaus
Look what just happened in Denmark...
Post a Comment