The Gospel Preached to the Patriarch Abraham
6 hours ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
St. John of San Francisco
Orthodox Information & Resources
Orthodox Blogs
-
-
-
Building God’s Temple4 days ago
-
-
-
A Clear Vision of Eternity3 weeks ago
-
-
Stories2 months ago
-
-
Non-Orthodox Blogs
-
-
-
Chapter 6: Modernism5 hours ago
-
-
Vocation to worship. . .6 hours ago
-
-
-
-
The Truth in Jesus1 day ago
-
The Guilded Mirror2 days ago
Politics Economics Culture & Miscellaneous Blogs
Don't blame me... I voted for George (the Third)
-
-
Office Xmas Party: 192520 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Escaping the News Encourages Tyranny3 weeks ago
Miscellaneous Sites of Interest
The Blog Yard
Where the best blogs go when they die...
Gone But Not Forgotten
-
-
-
-
A Dozen Years5 years ago
-
-
Moving day6 years ago
-
-
MY FELLOW AMERICANS7 years ago
-
Ten Years is a Long Run…9 years ago
-
Atom / RSS
1 comment:
The first section on Scripture is really interesting.
The problem overall is that the author states explicitly he cannot really do philosophy (aka theology in this case, setting aside some of the obscurantist Orthodox claims about the nature of theology as pure revelation), but that is inescapable. The reality is we cannot say God is the Good as such and deny the reality of Pauline universalism, at least without evacuating the term Goodness of any moral intelligibility. No appeal to Justice overcomes this (and generally arguments in this direction make things worse). This position essentially makes a case that Orthodox Catholic Christianity is untrue (if you really believe that some infallible dogma has been established that torment without end is an essential truth of the Faith). But even outside of Orthodoxy, I am not sure you can even make any coherent claim on behalf of God as such without reference to irreducible transcendentals, which brings us back to the same problem.
Of course this is obvious - really unavoidably obvious - which is why a long string of proof texts or appeals to authority without argument is the only path to a "case" on behalf of eternal damnation. What is being argued is not really anything about universalism per se, but something quite different, more along these lines: the Church is infallible. Part of its infallible teaching is that the reprobate are subject to eternal damnation. Therefore, universalism is false - regardless of what this makes us say about God as such, Christ, Goodness, Truth, etc.
But everyone knows all this, I think. Most simply aren't willing to try to fully square the circle when they claim universalism is a heresy. I suspect that is because they know it cannot be done. Those that don't recognize the impossibility of squaring the circle, well, I've yet to see something that isn't cringeworthy.
In any case, we really don't have a mechanism in Orthodoxy to fully delineate the idea, scope and application of infallibility, let alone any real mechanism to establish new dogmas: thank God for that.
Post a Comment