Friday, February 20, 2026
Wednesday, July 02, 2025
Did Pope Francis Lie?
Sunday, June 23, 2024
Damian Thompson on the rumors from Rome
Tuesday, November 15, 2022
The NY Times Discovers the Latin Mass
Saturday, December 18, 2021
Pope Francis' new attack on Catholic traditionalists
As predicted in a recent post, the pope has launched the next phase of his war on Catholic traditionalists. Among the new rules are draconian restrictions on the traditional rites for baptism, confession, marriage, and holy unction. The traditional rites for confirmation and ordination to holy orders are now prohibited entirely. Cleary Francis wants to drive these people out of the Catholic Church. This is a man without charity and who believes that he is the absolute master of the liturgy and the rites of his church. That is a dangerous combination.
How could anyone who is Orthodox contemplate entering into any kind of communion with a church that holds such beliefs and wages war on its own faithful?
ANAXIOS!
Friday, July 16, 2021
Pope Francis Restricts Use of Traditional Roman Rite (Tridentine Mass)
Pope Francis has issued a motu proprio, "Traditionis Custodes," which effectively abrogates Pope Benedict XVI's motu proprio "Summorum Pontificum," by which the former pope had liberated the ancient rite of the Latin Church. The new decree imposes sweeping restrictions on the use of the older liturgical rite and grants local bishops the authority to refuse to any priest the right to celebrate mass according to the old form. All priests must now secure permission to do so including those who have already been using the missal. For priests ordained after the publication of the new motu proprio (that is after today) permission to use the older rite is now reserved to the Apostolic See.
There is no possible interpretation of this document that does not lead one to conclude it is meant as an attack on conservative Catholics and the sensus fidelium of the Roman Catholic Church as it existed for its first 1900 years or so. That a pope would attempt to effectively suppress the heart of the liturgical patrimony of the Western Church, is quite simply scandalous. What was sacred for most of two millennia is now suspect, and those attached to it are clearly not quite right.
There is no charity or love in this. Only calculated cruelty.
ANAXIOS!
The full test of the motu proprio and the accompanying letter may be found here.
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
Some Good News From the Other Side of the Tiber
The US Military Academy has witnessed its first solemn High Mass according to the old rite in at least 57 years.
Details.
Wednesday, December 26, 2018
Reports: Pope Francis to abolish office overseeing Latin Mass
Friday, January 30, 2015
The 1965 Missal: The Real Mass of Vatican II?
Monday, July 29, 2013
Pope Francis Again: He restricts use of the Old Mass by some clergy
Fr. Z however has some very interesting background that adds a lot of perspective to this situation. Valid and fair points to be sure. But I am still left with the uncomfortable feeling that Summorum Pontificum has been weakened by this. It seems like Rome has used a sledgehammer to kill a fly. And other recent comments by the Pope have not helped to alleviate concerns that he is cool towards those Catholics attached to the historic rites of the Roman Church.
Monday, October 01, 2012
The Ochlophobist Dissents
Some of the complaints though seemed a tad nitpicky. OK so there were some moments when it looked like not everyone knew by heart the exact rubrics of the liturgy. Come on! How long has it been since Roman Catholic clergy were trained in the traditional liturgical rites of their church? How many priests much less bishops have ever participated in or even witnessed a solemn high mass from the throne?
I didn't see anything that looked like it was being done horribly wrong. And in fact it reminded me of hierarchical liturgies celebrated at my former parish in Merced. It's not an everyday occurrence. The bishop usually brought a subdeacon to serve as the discreet master of ceremonies who made sure everyone was where they were supposed to be at the time they were supposed to be there.
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Solemn High Mass By The New Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco
This bodes well for the most liberal diocese in the country. On the other hand there are some people in San Francisco who should be afraid, very afraid.
HT: Rorate
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Ad Multos Annos!
See the story and photos here.
Friday, May 13, 2011
Vatican issues new directive on pre-Vatican II liturgy (Latin Mass); bishops warned not to obstruct older form of the Mass
(Reuters) - The Vatican told Catholic bishops around the world on Friday they had to obey a papal order allowing priests to say the old-style Latin mass for traditionalist Catholics, whether they liked it or not.Read the rest here.
The Vatican issued an "instruction" to bishops as a follow-up to a 2007 papal decree authorizing the wider adoption of the Latin Mass, which was in universal use before the 1962-1965 Vatican Council introduced masses in local languages.
The re-instatement of the Latin mass was one of the demands of ultra-traditionalists whose leaders were excommunicated in 1988, prompting the first schism in modern times.
The pope, in a nod the traditionalists, satisfied many of them in 2007 when he allowed a wider use of the Latin mass, in which the priest faced east with his back to the faithful for most of the service.
But some bishops around the world said privately it was a headache because of the scarcity of priests trained in Latin, and logistical problems inserting Latin mass in their schedule.
The five-page instruction from the Vatican's doctrinal department, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, made it clear that the pope wants bishops to follow his orders.
"It is the task of the Diocesan bishop to undertake all necessary measures to ensure respect for the 'forma extraordinaria'," the instruction said, using a Latin term for the old liturgy.
While couched in polite, institutional language, the instruction said local parishes had to insert a Latin mass into their liturgical schedules if tradionalist faithful wanted it.
It also said pastors of parishes should show "a spirit of generous welcome" to whose who wanted the old mass and had to "permit such a celebration."
Commentary on this in the Roman Catholic corner of blogdom has been somewhat slow, I suspect in large part due to Bloggers recent problems. Look for vocal commentary from all sides of this debate in the coming days. For the record my prediction is that the modernist/lib Catholics (Episcopalians mostly who just haven't come to terms with their true calling) will have a fit over this. On the other side I suspect reaction among "traddies" will be cool to hostile. Many will feel that this does not go far enough. And the really hard core ones (SSPX and other groups that are either overtly or de facto schismatics) are not going to be happy with one part in particular. I have not had a chance to read the whole thing but I am told that there are elements warning against rejecting the legitimacy of the post Vatican II rites. If true; that's not gong to fly with the Angel Queen and Rorate Caeli crowd.
Update: I just had a chance to give the document a quick read and it looks good. I think this will be a plus for the Roman Church. Fr. Z called it a "No Hitter" as opposed to a "Perfect Game." That might be a tad generous. But I would certainly say this is a strong document. The really liberal elements in the clergy, especially bishops are NOT going to like it. One can imagine the editors of what Fr. Z calls the National Catholic Fishwrap suffering a collective seizure. And yes, there is a paragraph mandating acceptance of the legitimacy of the post V-II rites and obedience to Rome that is going to give heartburn to your more hard core traddies. Look for the libs to latch onto that.
Monday, July 28, 2008
SSPX: Tradition or Schism?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
SSPX Rapprochement?
First the reports are being posted by normally reliable sources. Secondly at least some in the SSPX seem to be confirming that something big may be imminent. And thirdly, unlike with most of the false rumors, this one has a date definitive mentioned (the 28th of June). This not only gives us a date, but it also is only a very short time away. Am I skeptical? I always am skeptical whenever reports of this nature surface about the SSPX. But others whose opinions I respect are taking this seriously. So I am not dismissing it.
I recommend the coverage over at Rorate Caeli which has a long track record for reporting on all things Traditionalist that is both well sourced and accurate.
UPDATE 06-24-08 @ 1045 PST: The rumors are true. Rorate has the text of the letter.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Benedict XVI & The Liturgical Jacobins
As he reminds us in his memoir, "Salt of the Earth," the young Joseph Ratzinger was deeply influenced, both spiritually and intellectually, by the mid-20th-century movement to reform the Roman Catholic Church's public worship--a movement that helped pave the way for the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). Father Ratzinger was a peritus, a theological expert, at the council, and like many others, he welcomed the council's Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy: here was a ratification of the liturgical reform movement he had long supported and a blueprint for further organic development of the celebration of mass. In the immediate aftermath of Vatican II, however, Ratzinger became convinced that organic development had been jettisoned for revolution, the liturgical Jacobins being a cadre of academics determined to impose their view of a populist liturgy on the entire Catholic Church.
In the decades between Vatican II and his election as Benedict XVI, Ratzinger became a leader in what became known as "the reform of the reform": a loosely knit international network of laity, bishops, priests and scholars, committed to returning the process of liturgical development in the Catholic Church to what they understood to be the authentic blueprint of Vatican II. Seeing a Gregorian chant CD from an obscure Spanish monastery rise to the top of the pop charts in the 1990s, they wondered why much of the church had abandoned one of Catholicism's classic musical forms. Finding congregations that seemed more interested in self-affirmation than worship, and priests given to making their personalities the center of the liturgical action, they asked whether the rush to create a kind of sacred circle in which the priest faces the people over the eucharistic "table" might have something to do with the problem.
And they reminded the entire church that Vatican II had not mandated many of the things most Catholics thought it had decreed: for example, the elimination of Latin (and chant) from the liturgy and the free-standing altar behind which the priest faced the congregation.
Read the rest of this excellent article here.
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Get that old time religion!
The traditional Latin Mass – effectively banned by Rome for 40 years – is to be reintroduced into every Roman Catholic parish in England and Wales, the senior Vatican cardinal in charge of Latin liturgy said at a press conference in London today.In addition, all seminaries will be required to teach trainee priests how to say the old Mass so that they can celebrate it in all parishes.
Catholic congregations throughout the world will receive special instruction on how to appreciate the old services, formerly known as the Tridentine Rite.
Yesterday’s announcement by the senior Vatican cardinal in charge of Latin liturgy, Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, speaking on behalf of Pope Benedict XVI, will horrify Catholic liberals, including many bishops of England and Wales.
Read the rest here.
(update) Another article on the subject...
For 40 years, English Catholic worship has been controlled by a bossy alliance of bishops and politically correct activists known as the "Sandalistas".
Now, a Colombian-born cardinal close to the Pope effectively announced that their time has come to an end.
Read the rest here.
